Rating: Mediocre
It
has been such a long time since I actually read this book that I considered not
reviewing it at all, but for various reasons The Lighthouse has stayed with me, so
I decided to write about it in brief anyway. The Lighthouse is Alison Moore’s
debut novel and is notable for the fact that it made the shortlist for the 2012
Man Booker Prize, therefore gaining this slight novel some serious attention.
The
Lighthouse
is the story of a middle-aged man called Futh, who embarks on a walking holiday
in Germany after the dissolution of his marriage. Unfortunately for Futh he
embodies the term ‘absolute loser’ and is an almost completely unlikable
character. During his circular ramble though the German countryside his
bathetic past is thoroughly picked through and it makes for very bleak reading
indeed. Futh’s life was initially blighted by being abandoned by his mother,
only to be left with his insipid father, who then went on to have one soulless
affair after another. Pretty much all of the supporting characters are both
dysfunctional and unlikable. I wouldn’t recommend The Lighthouse as a holiday read,
unless you particularly enjoy the psychology of human dysfunction.
The
fact that The Lighthouse in an entirely depressing narrative does not particularly
worry me, it is the fact that it made the Man Booker Prize shortlist for 2012
and has been lauded for its “serious” qualities. The novel does deal with the
important theme of how past traumas can shape the future. It is also a precisely
pieced together narrative – something akin to a literary jigsaw puzzle with
everything ultimately linked to each other. Unfortunately The Lighthouse also suffers from
having its internal mechanisms being entirely visible. There are a multitude of
all too obvious literary devices used throughout the narrative, all of which
could have been either omitted or used with more subtlety. Within its pages we have lighthouses,
moths and that old chestnut the Venus Fly-Trap as all too apparent metaphors.
Futh’s circular route through the German countryside, taking him back to the
guesthouse he started out from (called Hellhaus – meaning lighthouse in German,
sigh…) is a clichéd analogy for the dysfunctional eternal return of his life.
The most unoriginal metaphor occurs when Futh meets his childhood ‘friend’ at
the supermarket and ends up buying a bun that he had handled, complete with a
fingerprint - a heavy-handed metaphor for the fact that Futh’s friend was
sleeping with his wife.
This
brings us to the question of the worth of literature prizes such as the Man
Booker. Mantel’s two winning novels are certainly worthy, but what about the
truly excruciating The Finkler Question that won a few years ago – the
worst book I’ve ever read? That book still haunts me and I feel like my psyche
has been damaged in an insidious way. I’ve heard whispers that judges shirk
reading the books, passing the task onto underlings for assessment. I’ve also
been told that a former judge revealed in an interview that often the judges
are so deadlocked on deciding he final winner that the only compromise is to
give the award to a lesser book.
Perhaps the most interesting issue to think about is whether literature awards are actually good for authors and the industry as a whole. With everyone so fixated on awards perhaps many worthy authors and books are overlooked, with undeserving novels getting unwarranted attention whilst the more deserving fall by the wayside. There’s a rich tapestry of literature out there, far more than what appear on award long-lists. So are awards worth our attention? Or are do they create an illusion of quality and are more about the powerful sway of the market? I’m undecided – the jury’s out so to speak, but these days I’m feeling less inclined to read award-winning novels and I’m pretty sure my book club members are too.

